Skip to content

CLIENTS, CONTRACTORS, INSIDERS (Black Tuesday. Part 4)

Sadly, 3,063 people lost their lives in the terrorist attacks on 11 September 2001, also known as ‘Black Tuesday’. A similar number of people died at Pearl Harbor in December 1941. In fact, 2,923 people were killed and 879 were injured. While ‘Black Tuesday’ came as a terrible shock to the American people, some citizens knew about the attack in advance and attempted to exploit the situation for their own benefit. It is naive to believe the propaganda claiming that the operation was managed from an Afghan cave. This has been refuted by all terrorism experts who have analysed the attack, both immediately afterwards and in the years that followed. They all agreed that the control center for such a complex operation, which required the coordination of all the groups involved, must have been in America.

The targets of the attack were symbols of America. Their destruction was intended to provide Congress with the justification needed to declare war on behalf of the American people. The operation consisted of separate actions carried out by several groups, each with its own specific task. The participants were unaware of the existence of the other groups. Only the individuals coordinating their actions — the heads of the secret headquarters at the center of the operation — were aware of them.
The financial and commercial center in Manhattan symbolized America’s power and represented a source of national pride. Therefore, it was no coincidence that the architects of the plan chose it for destruction: they intended to have an emotional impact on national sentiment by demolishing and killing as many people as possible inside the buildings. A long war lay ahead, so the attack had to result in maximum destruction and casualties.

The planners of the terrorist attack knew that even ten aeroplanes alone would not be enough to destroy the skyscrapers, so they needed explosives. The total destruction of the towers was intended to add tragic to the plan as a whole, culminating in a bloody apotheosis. In this scenario, the kamikaze Islamic fanatics only had to serve as suicide bombers. This is a classic war provocation scenario that could be applauded by any aggressor.
Israel’s Mossad intelligence agency has a secret AL unit that re-recruits enemy agents and studies fanatical enemy suicide units, channeling their fanaticism into Israeli interests. Converted agents are given specific tasks. They are also offered financial compensation to ensure a trouble-free life for their families. Money! Money! This is described in the book ‘By Way of Deception’ by former Mossad agent Victor Ostrovsky.

The suicide pilots received training at American flight schools, which was overseen by the secret services. They were trained and supported. Relatives and friends of the terrorist pilots living in the East who consider them heroes are bitterly mistaken. In fact, these ‘heroes’ are victims of their own religious fanaticism and are nothing more than hired killers working for their enemies, the Zionists. Their ‘heroism’ has resulted in the deaths of hundreds of thousands of fellow Muslims, while millions more have been displaced and made homeless. Such mindless heroism and fanaticism deserves nothing but condemnation from their own people.

CONTRACTORS.
Anyone who believes the propaganda that the WTC towers collapsed as a result of the planes crashing into them, or who subscribes to the ‘pancake theory’, is being naïve. This lie has been refuted by 1,500 expert architects, whose detailed research of whom into the causes of the Manhattan disaster is available on websites such as www.911truth.com. All of these architects agree that the buildings collapsed as a result of controlled demolition: they were packed with explosives in advance and detonated at the right moment. For the buildings to collapse synchronously, floor by floor, into their own debris, all of the connections in the load-bearing structure would have had to be cut. How was this achieved?

In March 2001, Ace Elevator Company Stratesec/Securacom, specialists in lift installation and maintenance, began upgrading the lifts at the Manhattan Trade Center. The lift shafts provided direct access to the load-bearing steel columns at the center and perimeter of the skyscraper.
Each of the 110-storey towers contained 47 columns at the centre and 240 around the perimeter. A total of 60,000 connections had to be made, including 287 on the perimeter of each floor. The entire project took five months to complete.

Thanks to advances in modern military technology, nano-thermite explosive mixture can now be sprayed from an aerosol can in a matter of seconds. A remote detonator is then attached to the mixture and triggered by clicking a computer mouse operated by someone located far from the planned explosion site, instantly reducing the intended steel structure into liquid metal. Scientific assassins have become adept at finding new ways to kill. This process is known as technological progress for the benefit of humanity.

But how were those buildings rigged with explosives without arousing the suspicion of the numerous witnesses present? The access points used by the lift repairmen were guarded by men in Stratesec/Securacom uniforms. This company not only guarded the WTC, but also several airports, including Dallas Airport. The Boeing aircraft that allegedly crashed into the Pentagon (flight number 77) took off from there. Was it an accident? Or coincidence?
Strangely, the airport departure lounge was not equipped with video surveillance cameras, meaning the investigation had no documentary evidence as to whether the hijackers were among the passengers or had taken seats in the cockpit while wearing flight uniforms before take-off. Another coincidence?
Men in Stratesec/Securacom uniforms were also guarding the Los Alamos laboratory that produced the nano-thermite explosives, traces of which were found in Manhattan. One of this company’s directors was President Bush’s younger brother, Marvin.
Surely that’s too many coincidences?

DEBRIEFING:
Manhattan.
On that bloody Tuesday, events did not unfold exactly as those in the terrorist command center had planned. The terrorists made many mistakes during the complex operation, a fact that those responsible for the new war attempted to conceal through a propaganda campaign. US airspace is protected by the powerful electronic NORAD system. If a passenger aircraft deviates from its course within American airspace, serious measures are taken against the violator within 10–20 minutes, potentially including the destruction of the aircraft. However, that morning, America’s skies were open to intruders for over an hour.

At 8.47am, the first plane crashed into the North Tower of the World Trade Center (WTC), hitting six floors between the 93rd and 98th floors.
Sixteen minutes later, the second plane hit the South Tower of the WTC, striking the top seven floors between the 78th and 84th floors. The impact was accompanied by a flash of fuel, clearly visible in newsreel footage.

Experts estimate that around one-third of the petrol in the tank was consumed in the explosion. The rest of the fuel burned out within ten minutes, after which black smoke began to billow from the buildings, indicating an oxygen deficiency. There was burning furniture and equipment. This black smoke is clearly visible in newsreel footage of the event.
Although the fire from the burning furniture was not visible, the South Tower collapsed at free-fall speed after 56 minutes. Another 45 minutes later, the second tower followed.

After the first group of suicide bombers flew aeroplanes into the buildings, the next group took action. Professional bombers used computer technology to destroy both towers. Photographs of the destruction of the WTC buildings can be found at www.serendipity.com. The explosions can clearly be seen blowing clouds of dust (cement mixed with human remains) out of the windows, and the buildings can be seen collapsing neatly, floor by floor. This is a classic example of controlled demolition!
The website also contains the detailed findings of a team of architects who have scientifically disproved the idea that the WTC buildings were destroyed by aeroplane attacks.

PENTAGON
After the first plane crashed into one of the World Trade Center towers in Manhattan, a second plane hit the other tower. According to reports, a third plane then crashed into the Pentagon. Could such a thing be possible? The airspace above the Pentagon is the most heavily defended in the world. Any aircraft approaching the area must request permission from the defence system and provide a special code or password. Without this code, any aircraft entering the area would be shot down immediately by a missile. Yet that morning, Flight 77 — a Boeing 757 allegedly entered the airspace, circled over the Pentagon for a long time, selected an attack angle and then attacked.

The attack on the Pentagon involving a plane was shrouded in secrecy. The investigation team was prevented from investigating the incident for a further month while the area was cleaned up. The Pentagon’s entire territory and the walls of all its buildings are densely packed with video surveillance cameras. Undoubtedly, the cameras captured the attack from every possible angle. But was there an attack? The investigators were only shown blurred fragments of the video showing the explosion. And there was no aeroplane!

Documentary images posted on the Internet show a 12×12 foot (4×4 metre) round hole in the ground floor wall of the building. According to official propaganda, 189 passengers died in that plane attack, including 6 kamikaze terrorists. Thousands of questions have been asked of the government and military, including where the remains of the victims and the wreckage of the plane went, but all questions remain unanswered.

The Boeing 757 that allegedly carried out the attack had a wingspan of 38 metres, a body length of 47 metres, and a tail height of 45 feet (about 14 metres).
If we accept the official version, we must agree that the hijacker pilot was one of the best of all time rather than an inexperienced beginner who had learnt the basics at a flying school. The plane would have had to perform a dead loop, descending from a height of at least a thousand meters. It would then need to press its belly to the ground, shed its wings and tail, shrink to the size of a rocket and punch a hole in the ground-floor wall through which it could disappear. Neither the plane’s wreckage nor the victims’ remains were ever found. Is such a thing possible? Only in Hollywood. Or if the pilot was the Devil himself.

The plane was carrying 11,000 gallons (40,000 litres) of fuel, which would typically result in an enormous fire. So why did the burning paraffin, which according to the official investigation melted the steel columns and caused the 110-storey World Trade Center towers in Manhattan to collapse in seconds, not even cause any fire damage to the furniture in the offices on the ground floor above the hole in the Pentagon’s wall? The hole, as well as the surviving furniture, is clearly visible in photos. You don’t need to examine the pictures posted online closely to see them.

THE MANHATTAN GHOST.

It would be naive to think that the most advanced airspace tracking system in the US did not detect the aircraft that went off course on its radar screens that day. NORAD’s system tracked all aircraft from start to finish, and the air corridor was briefly opened for some of them. As soon as the first phase of the operation was complete after the two planes had hit the Twin Towers in Manhattan, the airspace was closed and any remaining aircraft were destroyed immediately. Once both WTC towers had been hit, President Bush ordered the closure of the country’s airspace. Just ten minutes later, United Airlines Flight 93, a Boeing passenger plane, was shot down over Pennsylvania by two F-16 fighter jets. The aircraft had been scheduled to fly to Los Angeles, but instead flew east without responding to air traffic controllers.
After being hit by missiles, the aircraft disintegrated and crashed into an empty field near the town of Shanksville. The wreckage was scattered over a wide area, with some pieces found up to eight miles away near New Baltimore. This fact will not be explained in the official investigation. Where was this plane going?

On that fateful day in September, another WTC building in Manhattan was blown up. At 17:20, seven hours after the collapse of the two World Trade Center towers, the 47-storey third skyscraper in the complex settled into its own ruins in six and a half seconds. Apparently, WTC Building 7 didn’t wait for its plane. Like the two towers, it had been rigged with explosives and this was destined to be discovered by investigators.
If this had happened, the conspirators’ plans to use Black Tuesday to start a new war would have been thwarted! The Pentagon would have had to go to war with its own people. WTC 7 held a secret that had to be buried under its rubble. So, from the ‘Operation Black Tuesday’ command centre, the order was given: blow it up! The destruction of this skyscraper, seven hours after the first two were destroyed, was a mysterious mistake that the world never discovered.

The best way to hide a fact is to let it slip into obscurity. In a free country, a single order from the propaganda control centre could silence all TV channels, radio stations and newspapers. Their voices were silenced.
The official government investigation into the 9/11 tragedy contains no information whatsoever about the destruction of Building 7.
This is because there is only one explanation for its destruction: it was a controlled demolition. You can find a chronicle of this destruction by typing just a few words into a search engine. The fact that the WTC 7 building was blown up remains a ticking time bomb under American society.

THE INSIDERS.

WALL STREET.
On the eve of the terrorist attack, the stock market was in a frenzy. Investors were buying options on United Airlines and American Airlines. Following the tragedy, Bloomberg News published a report revealing that activity on the options market for these two airlines had been 285 times higher than usual in the week leading up to the attack. There was no such activity on the stock market for other airlines.

Who gambled on the impending collapse of United Airlines and American Airlines shares? Probably, someone who knew that it would be the planes of these companies that would be chosen for the attack. They were also betting on the decline of Merrill Lynch, Morgan Stanley, and Bank of America shares, whose branches were located in the WTC buildings.

Following the tragedy, Merrill Lynch managers discovered that the average number of downside options on their bank’s stock had increased 50-fold in the four days prior to the attack.
Similarly, Morgan Stanley managers found that the market for their stock had grown 8-fold in the three days prior to the attack.
Bank of America saw a 5-fold increase in activity two days prior to the attack.

The sharks played the upside as well.
Purchases of options on Raytheon stock — the manufacturer of Patriot and Tomahawk missiles — increased 6-fold the day before the attacks.

Treasury securities, specifically five-year US Treasury notes, were actively purchased.
On 2 October, the Wall Street Journal reported that an unprecedented one-off purchase of these bonds totalling $5 billion had been made in the days leading up to the attack. Backed by the US government, these bonds represent the optimal investment choice in the current climate. Details of the financial scam can be found here: http://911research.wtc7.net/sept11/stockputs.html#financial

HOW LARRY SILVERSTEIN MADE $$ BILLIONS.
In early August 2001, Larry Silverstein — a partner and owner of Westfield America Corporation, which owns shopping centres across the United States — leased several buildings at the World Trade Center in Manhattan. Immediately after finalising the deal, he insured the buildings for three and a half billion dollars with a consortium of insurance companies. This insurance policy also covered losses resulting from acts of terrorism. When the buildings were destroyed a month later, Silverstein filed a lawsuit claiming twice that amount. His lawyers argued that the two buildings had been destroyed by two planes of two different companies and demanded 7 billion dollars. Silverstein won the lawsuit and got the money. How much Silverstein personally made from the scam remains a secret. But not millions. Billions! Having amassed such a fortune, he should change his name to Goldstein. Where did he get the information about the terrorist attack? Certainly not from Osama Bin Laden.

Who knew about all this? By releasing minimal information about the insiders, the government entities failed to keep its citizens informed about those who made substantial profits from the deaths of others. Black Tuesday safely eliminated the Pentagon’s financial problems in the post-Cold War era. The military department’s budget increased to an obscene size, making weapons production companies highly profitable once more. Halliburton, a company owned by former US Vice President Dick Cheney, received the largest contracts to rebuild facilities in Afghanistan and Iraq that had been destroyed by US bombs. First we bomb, then we rebuild what we have bombed and make money from both. Money doesn’t smell!


UNKNOWN HISTORICAL PARALLEL.

100 years ago, Trotsky and Lenin were allies during the invasion of Russia. But then Stalin came to the competition game. Trotsky was smarter and more cunning than the other two, a fact which both Lenin and Stalin feared and hated him for.
After eliminating Lenin and seizing power, Stalin decided not to kill Trotsky because he had too many loyal supporters. However, when the opportunity arose, Trotsky was declared an enemy of the Soviets and exiled to the West. It was important to remain Trotsky alive so that Stalin could use him to frighten the population and justify his dictatorship. Once the dictatorship had been established and the citizens enslaved, and the country had been isolated from the rest of the world, Trotsky’s exile had served its purpose. Stalin ordered Trotsky’s assassination because he possessed compromising information that could have been used against Stalin. By persecuting Trotsky, Stalin wanted to gain political benefits for himself personally. After his death, the dictator exclaimed, ‘Justice is done!’
And the soviet people rejoiced!

Osama bin Laden was a CIA agent. After receiving special training and funding from the United States, he established the Taliban organization to combat the Soviet occupation of Afghanistan in the 1980s. However, he later fell out with his former allies. Opposing America’s policy of occupying his country, he began carrying out terrorist attacks in an attempt to force the Americans to close their military bases and leave. Nevertheless, politics and business are two sides of the same coin. Despite being political adversaries, the Bushes and the Bin Ladens were friends and business partners in the oil industry. On 11 September 2001, the day of the terrorist attack, American airspace was closed to all planes, and the US government blamed Osama Bin Laden for the attack. However, the country’s skies were opened for a plane carrying 32 members of the Bin Laden family living in America. The plane was carrying the family members eastward.

Bush did not read about Stalin and Trotsky. But by starting a war in the East, the US president acted in exactly the same way as the Soviet dictator. Bush decided not to kill Osama. He needed him alive in order to gain political benefits for himself personally from the war. Therefore, when Osama was surrounded in the Tora Bora Valley in Afghanistan, Bush ordered American soldiers to stop. Osama fled further, and the American army pursued him, occupying new countries. When the war spread throughout the East and dragged on, just as its architects wanted, and the process of establishing a government dictatorship in the form of curtailing the constitutional freedoms of citizens took became irreversible, the mission of the hunted scapegoat Osama bin Laden was accomplished. As the bearer of compromising information, he was dangerous.

The story could end there. However, there is one important thing left to mention and this is justice. In all democratic countries, people trust the courts to administer justice in accordance with the law and the principles of justice that underpin society. Only courts have the right to judge. A court hearing is an act of justice involving prosecutors, defence lawyers, witnesses, and defendants. Defendants are given the right to speak. They can admit their guilt and repent. Alternatively, they may appeal. If they do so, their guilt will be proven again, by court. If they are found guilty, they will be punished, possibly even executed. And if the defendant’s life is taken, this will be in accordance with the laws of a democratic society.
In any other case, killing the accused without trial is an act of revenge, not justice. Such a killing may be regarded as an act of retribution. But it would be murder, not justice.

Barack Obama, the newly elected US President, was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize just 11 days after taking office, despite having achieved nothing on the world stage. Having received the prize money of over $1,000,000, he promised that he would only kill for peaceful purposes. However, on the eve of his second presidential term, he authorised the killing of Osama bin Laden in an attempt to secure votes in the election. Bin Laden could have been captured alive and put on trial, but he was deemed too dangerous for public trial. This was because he might have disclosed sensitive information about 11 September 2001. He could have become the prosecutor rather than the defendant. This is why the order was given not to take him alive. By ordering Bin Laden’s assassination without trial, President Obama effectively became no different to Stalin, who ordered Trotsky’s assassination. Obama became the arbiter of justice by ordering the assassination. He violated the law as accepted by society. He put himself above the law. By killing Bin Laden, Obama declared that justice had been served. And the people rejoiced!


COMMENT.

Analysts and political commentators often draw parallels between Black Tuesday in September 2001 and the attack on Pearl Harbor in December 1941. The most significant similarity is that both attacks prompted Congress to authorise the Pentagon to go to war.
When planning a new war at the beginning of the millennium, its architects realised that they needed a similarly shocking act of aggression from the enemy. This act had to be as treacherous as the attack on Pearl Harbor in order to shock the average citizen with the destruction and loss of thousands of American lives. Otherwise, no authorisation for war could be obtained.
In 1941, Roosevelt had it easier. By issuing Japan with an ultimatum that it could not possibly accept, he provoked it into making an extreme decision. Roosevelt’s plan was realised amid the European war, when it was possible to implicate all its participants in what had happened. There was someone to blame.

Sixty years later, the situation was different. Rather than looking for an excuse to get involved, it was America itself that had to go to war. A different approach was needed. The planners had to recreate the provocation in peacetime. They planned an offensive war. In order to gain the support of the people, as represented by their elected representatives in Congress, the provocation had to be barbaric and bloody on a large scale. It had to be so shocking that the world would be frozen in horror when they saw it on their screens.

However, over time, it became a defensive war for America and Europe. Those responsible were swiftly dismissed and went into hiding at various institutions and research centers. They were subsequently forgotten. The events unfolding in the world today are a consequence of the plans of those, whose names I mentioned in the first part of my investigation.

Years after those sad events, chance brought me together with a man. It turned out that he was a specialist engineer working for a company that restored historic buildings. His company was working on restoring the part of the Pentagon building that had been destroyed. When I mentioned in conversation that I thought it was a rocket and not an airplane, he smiled and widened his eyes, saying: ‘Oh, you know about that…’ It must have slipped out involuntarily. ‘But we won’t go into details,‘ he corrected himself immediately.

The day before 11 September 2001, U.S. Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld announced at a press conference that $2.3 trillion had been lost in Pentagon spending calculations. This equated to 25 per cent of the department’s annual military budget. A major scandal was looming. However, the next day’s attack overshadowed it.

Dov Zakheim, a Zionist and one of the architects of the Project for a New American Century (PNAC), served as the Pentagon’s chief financial controller. He was responsible for managing the funds allocated by Congress. Later, in 2003, when a congressional committee revisited the topic of embezzlement, a Pentagon financial report reflected the fact that money was missing in milder terms: ‘…more than $1 trillion was lost in the count…’. A softcore lie. Just like everything else.

© Copyright: Walter Maria, 2019 Certificate of Publication #219052701539

Published inHistory & Politics

Be First to Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *